Announcements
Visit the Cholesterol Management 101 blog.
New US Diet Guidelines: What Not to Eat
Instead of just giving Americans a list of healthy food choices, the federal government takes a stab at showing us what not to eat. Get the facts here.
New US Diet Guidelines: What Not to Eat
Instead of just giving Americans a list of healthy food choices, the federal government takes a stab at showing us what not to eat. Get the facts here.
LDL pattern A / LDL pattern B
Anon_154228 posted:
Has anyone requested from their MD to have their LDL gradient pattern type measeured?
As I understand it pattern B is bad but the standard test does not search for this since it is expensive to determine.
As I understand it pattern B is bad but the standard test does not search for this since it is expensive to determine.
14 Replies |Watch This Discussion | Report This| Share this:LDL pattern A / LDL pattern BHas anyone requested from their MD to have their LDL gradient pattern type measeured?<br /> <br />As I understand it pattern B is bad but the standard test does not search for this since it is expensive to determine.
bobby75703 responded:
I had at test done 10 years ago which determined I was the high risk pattern B with the small dense LDL particles.
I stumbled upon an article in a respected journal of clinical nutrition. Studies showed a favorable change in LDL pattern simply by avoiding wheat.
Despite my unfavorable LDL pattern, ultrasound shows no development of heart disease yet. I am 54 years old with clear arteries where visible by ultrasound.
I stumbled upon an article in a respected journal of clinical nutrition. Studies showed a favorable change in LDL pattern simply by avoiding wheat.
Despite my unfavorable LDL pattern, ultrasound shows no development of heart disease yet. I am 54 years old with clear arteries where visible by ultrasound.
Report This| Share this:LDL pattern A / LDL pattern BI had at test done 10 years ago which determined I was the high risk pattern B with the small dense LDL particles.<br /><br />I stumbled upon an article in a respected journal of clinical nutrition. Studies showed a favorable change in LDL pattern simply by avoiding wheat. <br /><br />Despite my unfavorable LDL pattern, ultrasound shows no development of heart disease yet. I am 54 years old with clear arteries where visible by ultrasound.
jp747 replied to bobby75703's response:
Did you request the test or did your MD?
Can you share the link to the article? I will talk to my MD next time I see him about the gradient test and hope for patter A.
ldl-225, tri-190, total 300, hdh-51
currently on 2g of niacin and get most of my fibre from wheat.
Can you share the link to the article? I will talk to my MD next time I see him about the gradient test and hope for patter A.
ldl-225, tri-190, total 300, hdh-51
currently on 2g of niacin and get most of my fibre from wheat.
Report This| Share this:LDL pattern A / LDL pattern BDid you request the test or did your MD?<br /> <br />Can you share the link to the article? I will talk to my MD next time I see him about the gradient test and hope for patter A.<br /> <br />ldl-225, tri-190, total 300, hdh-51<br />currently on 2g of niacin and get most of my fibre from wheat.
Google - ldl particle size diet - will get lots of info.
Here is one.
http://jn.nutrition.org/content/134/10/2517.abstract
After the CHO (high carb) diet, a significant increase in LDL particle size (P < 0.035) was noted with respect to the MUFA diet in apoE 4/3 subjects, whereas a significant decrease was observed in the apoE 3/3 individuals (P < 0.043). In conclusion, a Mediterranean diet, high in MUFA-fat increases LDL particle size compared with a CHO diet, and this effect is dependent of apoE genotypes.
A very quick glance at some of the other results gave similar results. First the size of the particles are determined by genetics, but 2nd a high triglyceride levels will lead to small size LDL.
Here is one.
http://jn.nutrition.org/content/134/10/2517.abstract
After the CHO (high carb) diet, a significant increase in LDL particle size (P < 0.035) was noted with respect to the MUFA diet in apoE 4/3 subjects, whereas a significant decrease was observed in the apoE 3/3 individuals (P < 0.043). In conclusion, a Mediterranean diet, high in MUFA-fat increases LDL particle size compared with a CHO diet, and this effect is dependent of apoE genotypes.
A very quick glance at some of the other results gave similar results. First the size of the particles are determined by genetics, but 2nd a high triglyceride levels will lead to small size LDL.
Report This| Share this:LDL pattern A / LDL pattern BGoogle - ldl particle size diet - will get lots of info.<br /><br />Here is one.<br /><br /><a rel="nofollow" href="http://jn.nutrition.org/content/134/10/2517.abstract">http://jn.nutrition.org/content/134/10/2517.abstract</a> <br /><br /><i>After the CHO (high carb) diet, a significant increase in LDL particle size (<i>P</i> < 0.035) was noted with respect to the MUFA diet in apoE 4/3 subjects, whereas a significant decrease was observed in the apoE 3/3 individuals (<i>P</i> < 0.043). In conclusion, a Mediterranean diet, high in MUFA-fat increases LDL particle size compared with a CHO diet, and this effect is dependent of apoE genotypes. </i><br /><br />A very quick glance at some of the other results gave similar results. First the size of the particles are determined by genetics, but 2nd a high triglyceride levels will lead to small size LDL.<br /><br /> <br />
bobby75703 replied to jp747's response:
Hi jp747,
No, I didn't request the test. The Doctor ordered it. When the results came back He said I have "very bad cholesterol".
I will have to search for the article as this was several years ago and I didn't book mark it. But I remember it clearly because I had asked my doctor if dietary changes could influence particle size and he said "no". When I stumbled upon the article about avoiding wheat changing particle size I was enraged at my doctors lack of knowledge on nutritional impact on LDL partical size.
If I find the article I will post the link for you.
Bobby
No, I didn't request the test. The Doctor ordered it. When the results came back He said I have "very bad cholesterol".
I will have to search for the article as this was several years ago and I didn't book mark it. But I remember it clearly because I had asked my doctor if dietary changes could influence particle size and he said "no". When I stumbled upon the article about avoiding wheat changing particle size I was enraged at my doctors lack of knowledge on nutritional impact on LDL partical size.
If I find the article I will post the link for you.
Bobby
Report This| Share this:LDL pattern A / LDL pattern BHi jp747,<br /><br />No, I didn't request the test. The Doctor ordered it. When the results came back He said I have "very bad cholesterol".<br /><br />I will have to search for the article as this was several years ago and I didn't book mark it. But I remember it clearly because I had asked my doctor if dietary changes could influence particle size and he said "no". When I stumbled upon the article about avoiding wheat changing particle size I was enraged at my doctors lack of knowledge on nutritional impact on LDL partical size.<br /><br />If I find the article I will post the link for you.<br /><br />Bobby
BillH99 responded:
My cardiologist did not think that I needed such a test because of the my lipid profile.
http://www.johnshopkinshealthalerts.com/reports/heart_health/1886-1.html
The Bottom Line: A number of cardiologists use these new tests on many of their patients. However, it's usually not necessary for a doctor to know the size of a patient's LDL particles to choose the right treatment. That's because knowing blood levels of LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides from the standard blood lipid test -- along with other traditional risk factors such as your smoking habits, blood pressure, and blood glucose levels, to name a few -- are enough to make the correct treatment decision in the vast majority of people.
In fact, your doctor can usually predict whether you have small, dense LDL particles based simply on your levels of triglycerides and HDL: Triglyceride levels higher than 120 mg/dL and an HDL level below normal (less than 40 mg/dL in men and less than 50 mg/dL in women) are usually associated with small, dense LDL particles. What's more, treating traditional risk factors with a low saturated fat diet, weight loss, exercise, and statin drugs also lowers levels of small, dense LDL particles.
But that it would not hurt to get a test of Lp(a) because of a family history of early heart attack.
While there is a separate Lp(a) test available the VAP test measure it along with the all of the sub-fractions of cholesterol.
So at my next cholesterol test I ask my PCP for the VAP test. He had never heard of it and it was not in his computer system. But he finally found the code to order it.
VAP and NMR are available through the national laboratories (Quest and LabCorp).
They are roughly $75-125 list.
As it turns all of the sub-fractions where very good, as the cardiologist suggested. But the Lp(a) was mildly elevated.
But my LDL was optimum (less than 70) on statin. He would add niacin, if I wanted, to lower the Lp(a). But currently there is no trails that show just lowerng Lp(a) helps. Most guidelines indicate to treat LDL if you have high Lp(a).
So we agreed to just the statin.
http://www.johnshopkinshealthalerts.com/reports/heart_health/1886-1.html
The Bottom Line: A number of cardiologists use these new tests on many of their patients. However, it's usually not necessary for a doctor to know the size of a patient's LDL particles to choose the right treatment. That's because knowing blood levels of LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides from the standard blood lipid test -- along with other traditional risk factors such as your smoking habits, blood pressure, and blood glucose levels, to name a few -- are enough to make the correct treatment decision in the vast majority of people.
In fact, your doctor can usually predict whether you have small, dense LDL particles based simply on your levels of triglycerides and HDL: Triglyceride levels higher than 120 mg/dL and an HDL level below normal (less than 40 mg/dL in men and less than 50 mg/dL in women) are usually associated with small, dense LDL particles. What's more, treating traditional risk factors with a low saturated fat diet, weight loss, exercise, and statin drugs also lowers levels of small, dense LDL particles.
But that it would not hurt to get a test of Lp(a) because of a family history of early heart attack.
While there is a separate Lp(a) test available the VAP test measure it along with the all of the sub-fractions of cholesterol.
So at my next cholesterol test I ask my PCP for the VAP test. He had never heard of it and it was not in his computer system. But he finally found the code to order it.
VAP and NMR are available through the national laboratories (Quest and LabCorp).
They are roughly $75-125 list.
As it turns all of the sub-fractions where very good, as the cardiologist suggested. But the Lp(a) was mildly elevated.
But my LDL was optimum (less than 70) on statin. He would add niacin, if I wanted, to lower the Lp(a). But currently there is no trails that show just lowerng Lp(a) helps. Most guidelines indicate to treat LDL if you have high Lp(a).
So we agreed to just the statin.
Report This| Share this:LDL pattern A / LDL pattern BMy cardiologist did not think that I needed such a test because of the my lipid profile. <br /><br /><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.johnshopkinshealthalerts.com/reports/heart_health/1886-1.html">http://www.johnshopkinshealthalerts.com/reports/heart_health/1886-1.html</a> <br /><i><br /></i><i> <b>The Bottom Line: </b> A number of cardiologists use these new tests on many of their patients. However, it's usually not necessary for a doctor to know the size of a patient's LDL particles to choose the right treatment. That's because knowing blood levels of LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides from the standard blood lipid test -- along with other traditional risk factors such as your smoking habits, blood pressure, and blood glucose levels, to name a few -- are enough to make the correct treatment decision in the vast majority of people. <br /></i><br /><i><br /></i><br /><i> </i><i> In fact, your doctor can usually predict whether you have small, dense LDL particles based simply on your levels of triglycerides and HDL: Triglyceride levels higher than 120 mg/dL and an HDL level below normal (less than 40 mg/dL in men and less than 50 mg/dL in women) are usually associated with small, dense LDL particles. What's more, treating traditional risk factors with a low saturated fat diet, weight loss, exercise, and statin drugs also lowers levels of small, dense LDL particles.</i><br /><br />But that it would not hurt to get a test of Lp(a) because of a family history of early heart attack.<br /><br />While there is a separate Lp(a) test available the VAP test measure it along with the all of the sub-fractions of cholesterol.<br /><br />So at my next cholesterol test I ask my PCP for the VAP test. He had never heard of it and it was not in his computer system. But he finally found the code to order it.<br /><br />VAP and NMR are available through the national laboratories (Quest and LabCorp).<br /><br />They are roughly $75-125 list.<br /><br /> As it turns all of the sub-fractions where very good, as the cardiologist suggested. But the Lp(a) was mildly elevated.<br /><br />But my LDL was optimum (less than 70) on statin. He would add niacin, if I wanted, to lower the Lp(a). But currently there is no trails that show just lowerng Lp(a) helps. Most guidelines indicate to treat LDL if you have high Lp(a).<br /><br />So we agreed to just the statin.
bobby75703 replied to bobby75703's response:
jp747,
Here is one article. Like I said its been years so I can't remember if this is THE article I read, but this is one relating wheat to smaller dense LDL particle size.
http://www.ajcn.org/content/76/2/351.short
The take home message I get from this: If a guy chooses oats over wheat, his LDL particle size will change to a larger particle.
Bobby
Here is one article. Like I said its been years so I can't remember if this is THE article I read, but this is one relating wheat to smaller dense LDL particle size.
http://www.ajcn.org/content/76/2/351.short
The take home message I get from this: If a guy chooses oats over wheat, his LDL particle size will change to a larger particle.
Bobby
Report This| Share this:LDL pattern A / LDL pattern Bjp747,<br /><br />Here is one article. Like I said its been years so I can't remember if this is THE article I read, but this is one relating wheat to smaller dense LDL particle size.<br /><br /><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ajcn.org/content/76/2/351.short">http://www.ajcn.org/content/76/2/351.short</a> <br /><br />The take home message I get from this: If a guy chooses oats over wheat, his LDL particle size will change to a larger particle.<br /><br />Bobby
jp747 replied to bobby75703's response:
correction to my levels...
hdl 51
ldl 185
tri-112
ttl 258
based on this patter A is likely
hdl 51
ldl 185
tri-112
ttl 258
based on this patter A is likely
Report This| Share this:LDL pattern A / LDL pattern Bcorrection to my levels...<br /> <br />hdl 51<br />ldl 185<br />tri-112<br />ttl 258<br /> <br />based on this patter A is likely
bobby75703 replied to jp747's response:
The only way to know for sure is to do the test. But I honestly don't know how good of a predictor of heart disease it is.
Some people follow the particle size theory, others don't. I have been sitting on the fence undecided on this, watching to see what happens.
Some people follow the particle size theory, others don't. I have been sitting on the fence undecided on this, watching to see what happens.
Report This| Share this:LDL pattern A / LDL pattern BThe only way to know for sure is to do the test. But I honestly don't know how good of a predictor of heart disease it is. <br /><br />Some people follow the particle size theory, others don't. I have been sitting on the fence undecided on this, watching to see what happens.
bobby75703 replied to jp747's response:
jp747,
Here is an interesting article discussing the matter of particle size.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_50/b3912131_mz070.htm
I noted the statement "Studies indicate your condition is likely to worsen if you get below 25% of your calories from fat."
Here is an interesting article discussing the matter of particle size.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_50/b3912131_mz070.htm
I noted the statement "Studies indicate your condition is likely to worsen if you get below 25% of your calories from fat."
Report This| Share this:LDL pattern A / LDL pattern Bjp747, <br /><br />Here is an interesting article discussing the matter of particle size. <br /><br /><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_50/b3912131_mz070.htm">http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_50/b3912131_mz070.htm</a> <br /><br />I noted the statement<i> "Studies indicate your condition is likely to worsen if you get below 25% of your calories from fat."</i>
BillH99 replied to bobby75703's response:
From what I have seen, looking at more doctor directed sites, is that a very large number of doctors don't think that current lipid profiles is really a good measure.
And that the next report from the national panel (due in the next 6 months) will have some changes.
But what is still up in the air.
Some thing that particle count is more important. Others particle size or distribution.
And some look at ApoB100 which is related to particle count.
And some look at non-HDL cholesterol. That is total ch - HDL. And it is suppose to track ApoB100.
AFAIK there is no common test (ie, low cost) test for size or particle count. But there might be (just don't remember) one for ApoB100.
And that the next report from the national panel (due in the next 6 months) will have some changes.
But what is still up in the air.
Some thing that particle count is more important. Others particle size or distribution.
And some look at ApoB100 which is related to particle count.
And some look at non-HDL cholesterol. That is total ch - HDL. And it is suppose to track ApoB100.
AFAIK there is no common test (ie, low cost) test for size or particle count. But there might be (just don't remember) one for ApoB100.
Report This| Share this:LDL pattern A / LDL pattern BFrom what I have seen, looking at more doctor directed sites, is that a very large number of doctors don't think that current lipid profiles is really a good measure.<br /><br />And that the next report from the national panel (due in the next 6 months) will have some changes.<br /><br />But what is still up in the air.<br /><br />Some thing that particle count is more important. Others particle size or distribution.<br /><br />And some look at ApoB100 which is related to particle count.<br /><br />And some look at non-HDL cholesterol. That is total ch - HDL. And it is suppose to track ApoB100.<br /><br />AFAIK there is no common test (ie, low cost) test for size or particle count. But there might be (just don't remember) one for ApoB100.
BillH99 replied to bobby75703's response:
I think that a lot of medical problems (heart, obesity, diabetes) relates to the 80's mantra of low fat. And many of the commercial low fat products where high in carbohydrates, specially simple ones.
Report This| Share this:LDL pattern A / LDL pattern BI think that a lot of medical problems (heart, obesity, diabetes) relates to the 80's mantra of <i>low fat.</i> And many of the commercial low fat products where high in carbohydrates, specially simple ones.
bobby75703 replied to BillH99's response:
I agree with you Bill. I remember the low fat craze. America got fatter and fatter, with more diabetes.
Report This| Share this:LDL pattern A / LDL pattern BI agree with you Bill. I remember the low fat craze. America got fatter and fatter, with more diabetes.
OHB3dotcom responded:
The test you need is called the VAP test. It's available to doctors every where and the price is now comparative to regular lipid profile test.
Report This| Share this:LDL pattern A / LDL pattern BThe test you need is called the VAP test. It's available to doctors every where and the price is now comparative to regular lipid profile test.
OHB3dotcom replied to bobby75703's response:
Low fat foods use sugar to make them palatable. That's why America got fatter. Sugar will do that.
Report This| Share this:LDL pattern A / LDL pattern BLow fat foods use sugar to make them palatable. That's why America got fatter. Sugar will do that.
Featuring Experts
There are no Expert stories for this community right nowHelpful Tips
Lower Cholesterol by changing my chemical balance - eating habits
With a history of heart disease in my family (father), I was all to aware of the need to keep my numbers under control. A few years ago, I ... More
Was this Helpful?
18
of
19 found this helpful
Helpful Resources
Related News
Related Drug Reviews
- Drug Name User Reviews
Report Problems to the
Food and Drug Administration
You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.
Other Cholesterol Management Information
More Related Communities
The opinions expressed in WebMD User-generated content areas like communities, reviews, ratings, or blogs are solely those of the User, who may or may not have medical or scientific training. These opinions do not represent the opinions of WebMD. User-generated content areas are not reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance, objectivity, or any other reason except for compliance with our Terms and Conditions. Some of these opinions may contain information about treatments or uses of drug products that have not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. WebMD does not endorse any specific product, service, or treatment.
Do not consider WebMD User-generated content as medical advice. Never delay or disregard seeking professional medical advice from your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider because of something you have read on WebMD. You should always speak with your doctor before you start, stop, or change any prescribed part of your care plan or treatment. WebMD understands that reading individual, real-life experiences can be a helpful resource, but it is never a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment from a qualified health care provider. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or dial 911 immediately.
Health Solutions From Our Sponsors
About WebMD Advertise With Us Terms of Use Privacy Policy Sponsor Policy Site Map Careers Contact Us
First Aid WebMD Magazine WebMD Health Record WebMD Mobile Newsletters Dictionary Physician Directory
©2005-2013 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved.
WebMD does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See additional information.