Skip to content

    Announcements

    Exciting News for WebMD Members!

    We've been busy behind the scenes building new message boards for you. You'll have new and easier ways to find messages, connect with others, and share your stories.

    And, this will all be available on your smartphone or other mobile device!

    What Do You Need to Do?

    The message board you're used to will be closing in the coming weeks. While many of your boards will be making the move to our new home, your posts will not. Want to keep a discussion going? Save posts you want to continue (this includes your member profile story), so that you can re-post them in the new message boards.

    Keep an eye here and on your email inbox, we'll be back in touch soon to give you all the information you need!


    Yours in health,
    WebMD Message Boards Management

    New Cholesterol Guidelines
    avatar
    bobby75703 posted:
    Stumbled into this today. Physician blogs on his viewpoint on the new cholesterol guidelines.

    http://www.communitycatalyst.org/blog/the-statin-fiasco#.Uwvan_ldWSp
    Reply
    FirstPrevious12NextLast
     
    avatar
    iride6606 responded:
    Fact based science response, no emotions;

    http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/new-cholesterol-guidelines/
     
    avatar
    bobby75703 replied to iride6606's response:
    I thought this doctor was very observant. clearly he noted the contradictions. Emotions has nothing to do with it. Its about exercising discernment and good judgement.
     
    avatar
    iride6606 replied to bobby75703's response:
    Funny, you should read the Doctor's profile
     
    avatar
    bobby75703 replied to iride6606's response:
    He makes excellent observations.
     
    avatar
    iride6606 replied to bobby75703's response:
    Too funny, you still obviously don't read anything I post. SHE is a very interesting person;


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harriet_A._Hall
     
    avatar
    bobby75703 replied to iride6606's response:
    iride, I was referring to Stephen Smith MD of my original post when I said "he".

    Hadn't met a girl named Stephen before.
     
    avatar
    bobby75703 replied to bobby75703's response:
    This thread is about the blog of a physician who gives his observations and opinions of the new cholesterol guidelines.

    http://www.communitycatalyst.org/blog/the-statin-fiasco#.UxOta_ldWSq

    Dr. Stephen Smith is a he, not a "she" and I can't find anything wrong with his profile.
     
    avatar
    iride6606 replied to bobby75703's response:
    Pretty sure your we're referring to my post and the blog cited, but we'll go with that. Too bad your doctor Smith can't have the same level of "no emotion"


    I hope the next "expert panel" that American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology put together to come up with new guidelines will do a better job to prevent conflicts of interest from casting doubt on their recommendations for improving the quality of patient treatment


    Sure sounds like criticism and emotion to me. FYI, check his profile a bit closer and see his affiliations. I though disclosure was important to you, maybe not as much as you have stated previously. I got a good laugh out of it, you may not.
     
    avatar
    iride6606 replied to iride6606's response:
    FYI, he's not even accurate. His statement;


    How could a group of such smart cardiologists not have seen what was so evident to me? Maybe the fact that half the cardiologists on the "expert panel" that created these new guidelines received payments from drug companies could have played a role? We know from social science literature that having such financial conflicts of interest can subtly and unconsciously affect judgment.


    is wrong. Any member with any possible conflict were not included in the vote. Just a little more research would have caught that.
     
    avatar
    bobby75703 replied to iride6606's response:
    I was only referring to the blog by Dr. Stephen Smith. Nothing else. Sorry there was a misunderstanding. Have a good one.
     
    avatar
    bobby75703 replied to bobby75703's response:
    Dr. Smith is not the only physician to make these observations.
     
    avatar
    iride6606 replied to bobby75703's response:
    No, just the one you cited. Did you find his conflict of interest?
     
    avatar
    bobby75703 replied to iride6606's response:
    Sorry iride, but its not just the Doctor I cited. There are others.

    Every time the cholesterol guidelines are revised, it expands the number of people taking statins. At first doctors took this in stride. However with this latest revision which could double the number of people taking statins, there is increased skepticism. More eyebrows are being raised than ever before.


    Professor Rita Redberg and Dr. John Abramson have voiced their concerns over the new guidelines, and it was picked up by the media.

    It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see the huge conflict of interest in increasing the number of people taking statins. As long as a guy has a pulse and is breathing it should be obvious.

    As a result, the new guidelines have stirred up huge controversy.
     
    avatar
    iride6606 replied to bobby75703's response:
    They have also stirred up a considerable promise is the treatment of high cholesterol.




    Why should it be obvious, because a group of doctors say so? Where is this overly obvious conflict of interest? They didn't even allow the doctors on the panel to vote if they ever had ties to a drug company. That could almost be reverse bias.


    That alone should make it obvious to anyone with a pulse that there was no conflict in the final decision.


    Featuring Experts

    There are no Expert stories for this community right now

    Helpful Tips

    Statin use is generally safe, and NOT associated with cancer and myopathy
    This network meta-analysis study provides evidence on the comparative tolerability and harms of individual statins. Overall, statins as a ... More
    Was this Helpful?
    1 of 2 found this helpful

    Helpful Resources

    Be the first to post a Resource!

    Related Drug Reviews

    • Drug Name User Reviews

    Report Problems With Your Medications to the FDA

    FDAYou are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.