See All
Preferences
My Communities
My Discussions
My Email Digests
Announcements
New US Diet Guidelines: What Not to Eat
Instead of just giving Americans a list of healthy food choices, the federal government takes a stab at showing us what not to eat. Get the facts here.
In my opinion, doctors, especially general internists, should treat us as individuals, not as numbers to fit into guidelines. I believe I'm healthier at a lower weight without cravings, even if my LDL is higher than the guidelines. We'll see who's still alive at 90, folks!
Take the Poll
- Changes in weight or not
- Changes in appetite or not
- Both weight and appetite changes
- No changes

Poll Results
-
Changes in weight or not16% (34)
-
Changes in appetite or not3% (6)
-
Both weight and appetite changes58% (121)
-
No changes23% (49)
Since I have never taken a statin, I don't qualify for your poll.
But I have heard the complaint of weight gain on statins.
My best guess:
Statins reduce the production of CoQ10 which is needed to produce ATP to give cells their energy.
Any reduction in coQ10 may reduce cellular energy, thus slowing metabolism and resulting in weight gain. Much like to hypothyroidism, but a differnt mechanism.
Since our bodies produce its steriod hormones from cholesterol, interupting the mevalonate pathway with statins may induce a hormonal deficiency, which could slow metabolism and contribute to the weight gain.
Since carbohydrates are fast energy, you may have been craving carbs to compensate for lost energy from the statin.
Once you consumed those carbs, there wasn't enough cellular energy to burn off the extra fuel, and it got stored as weight gain.
Bobby
I do wish docs/drug companies would address these issues, even if there are few people with the problems -- as a basic scientist myself, I don't think enough is known to have everyone on these meds when their risk factors are relatively low, even though not ideal.
Sales and marketing of statins is targeting new markets. These include people with low risk factors, some with low cholesterol, and they have even tried to approach marketing statins to kids. I agree that not enough is known. We are definately wandering into unexplored territory when we mass market to people with low risk.
Since you are into science, I would suggest doing research on Statin NNT scores ( Number Needed to Treat)
This will give a clear picture on the benefits of statins.
Bobby
You hit the nail on the head with that statement as cholesterol serves many vital functions in the body.
Consumers forget or are unaware that lowering cholesterol to ward off heart attacks and strokes is an old theory. For many researchers it is a dated theory. However the market for lowering cholesterol remains strong, and the drug industry is squeezing every dollar they can out of their cholesterol lowering pills.
Is there really such a thing as bad cholesterol? If its so bad, why did nature place it in our bodies in the first place?
Think about it.
Nature placed cholesterol in our bodies because it has a function. So does blood, fat, bile, etc., etc. The problem is not with the presence of the thing, the problem is with the level.
If your blood is too thin or too thick, you have a problem. If your heart can not pump it properly, there is a problem (either with the heart -- which nature put there) or the blood.
So too with cholesterol. Too much LDL or too little HDL or too much total cholesterol is the problem, not the fact that they are present to begin with.
One must control the levels of literally hundreds of compounds, chemicals, fluids, etc., within one's body to maintain health. Modern chemistry has provided many solutions if there are control problems. Don't discount them nor the educated opinions of the majority of doctors. And make sure to see your physician at least twice a year, and get all the blood tests he prescribes. It could save your life.
I wonder if I had eased off the statin slowly whether the levels would have increased so quickly.
Yes, cholesterol does serve many vital functions.
I used to be a firm believer in the cholesterol theory, however today I no longer believe total serum levels of cholesterol are the culprit in atherosclerosis.
I do believe that lipids become involved. After all, they are present in artery plaque, but I no longer view them as the cause.
The primary reason I believe this way is because people with low levels of cholesterol develop artery plaque too. Something else causes the plaque to develop despite the levels of total cholesterol.
Just because cholesterol is present, doesn't make it the cause.
I look at it this way: A series of bank robberies occurs. Each time the armed gunmen hold the bank customers as hostages, then manage to elude police by escaping.
Should the police blame the customers since they are present? Of course not. Perhaps reducing the number of customers in the bank would solve the problem? Of course not. The armed gunmen will strike again despite how many customers are in the bank.
Likewise, thats exactly whats happens with heart disease. Half the heart attacks happen to people with high cholesterol, and half the heart attacks happen to people with low cholesterol. And the underlying culprit continues to elude researchers.
I have not muscle weakness or pain.
In fact, after CABG and rotator cuff surgery have been exercising and strong than I have been in the last 5 years.
More from WebMD related to this Discussion
Women's Health Newsletter
Find out what women really need.
Featuring Experts
There are no Expert stories for this community right nowPopular Discussions
Helpful Tips
- Lower choleterol without drugs
- Lower Cholesterol by changing my chemical balance - eating habits
- Lower cholesterol without drugs
Helpful Resources
Related News
Related Drug Reviews
- Drug Name User Reviews
Report Problems to the
Food and Drug Administration
You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.
Other Cholesterol Management Information
More Related Communities
The opinions expressed in WebMD User-generated content areas like communities, reviews, ratings, or blogs are solely those of the User, who may or may not have medical or scientific training. These opinions do not represent the opinions of WebMD. User-generated content areas are not reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance, objectivity, or any other reason except for compliance with our Terms and Conditions. Some of these opinions may contain information about treatments or uses of drug products that have not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. WebMD does not endorse any specific product, service, or treatment.
Do not consider WebMD User-generated content as medical advice. Never delay or disregard seeking professional medical advice from your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider because of something you have read on WebMD. You should always speak with your doctor before you start, stop, or change any prescribed part of your care plan or treatment. WebMD understands that reading individual, real-life experiences can be a helpful resource, but it is never a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment from a qualified health care provider. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or dial 911 immediately.
Health Solutions From Our Sponsors
©2005-2013 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved.
WebMD does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See additional information.


