I'm newly diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes, and I'm on 1000 mg. of metformin in the morning and again at bedtime. I've been having spells of shakiness, anxiety, headaches, and nausea which I know are my signs of being hypoglycemic (I had reactive hypoglycemia for years before being diagnosed with diabetes.) When I test myself, I'll be somewhere between 80-100 when I get this way. I then eat something containing sugar, and in a little while, I feel better. Is it normal for some people to get hypoglycemic symptoms with blood sugars in this range, or will this get better with time? Also, I have been eating healthily and keeping my calories in a range at which I normally can lose weight, but I'm not losing weight! Is losing weight going to be harder for me now?
What are your readings before you take the Metformin? My blood sugar, without meds, can run in the 200 and sometimes 300's. since my body had had my ranges so high, when they get to a normal range, I can experience these symptoms as well. Once you have been on the meds for a while this should start to taper off and go away. Also, I had been on Metformin myself and could not take it because it upset my stomach so much. I have heard this quite alot from nay people. I now take Glimepiride and unfortunately have just recently been put on Lantus ( which is a shot ). Good luck to you
Your body is probably used to higher glucose levels, so the new "normal" range takes a little time for the body to adjust.
I'm not sure how long you've been on the metformin, but usually it makes weight loss a little easier. Perhaps you need to give it some time. Your body may be using your food more efficiently now that your glucose levels are in the normal range.
Michelle Diabetic since 5/2001 Follow my journey at www.mch-breastcancer.blogspot.com Smile and the world smiles with you.
LadyMorna posted: ... When I test myself, I'll be somewhere between 80-100 when I get this way. I then eat something containing sugar, and in a little while, I feel better...
If you have had elevated blood sugar levels for a while prior to diagnosis, Michelle is correct in stating that it will take a little time for your body to readjust to more normal levels. However, eating something containing sugar to drive your blood glucose levels above normal isn't the most prudent thing to do because it not only will prolong your body's readjustment period but recent studies have shown that glycation damage to your body's proteins actually occurs at 86 mg/dL and higher. The unpleasant feelings you are experiencing when BG ranges are in the normal range should diminish within 30 days; at least for most people. I would recommend that you continue to periodically test your BG levels when those tremors and jitters strike but refrain from intentionally driving BG above normal.
OK, I'm more than a little worried after reading that studies show that glycation damage occurs at 86 mg/dl or higher. My nutritionist and family physician set my goal at 70-110 fasting and 80-140 2 hrs. post-prandial. I usually run high 80s or low 90s fasting and anywhere from 80-125 post. My 3 a1cs since dx have been 5.9, 5.9 and 6.0. I've been told this is great, that I've got it under tight control, but reading this I'm wondering if I'm continuing to do damage to my body! I've been assured I can enjoy a normal lifespan with these numbers but what exactly does glycation damage to my body's proteins mean?
It's in NutriJoy's post two up from mine. I googled and didn't find anything. I can't imagine; 80s and 90s are considered great numbers by just about every health care professional I've talked to about this...
Dr. Richard K. Bernstein refers to the 85 mg/dL aheis the upper limits of "normal" and even the ADA has acknowledged that the same. In fact, in a journal article over a decade ago (Jan.1999), a study of nondiabetic men indicated that those with blood sugar levels >86 mg/dL had a 40% increased risk of a cardiac event than those who had BG levels <86. To save you time in a search engine, here is a direct reference:
"... Those with glucose above 85 mg/dL are at increased risk of heart attack. This was shown in a study of nearly 2,000 men where fasting blood glucose levels were measured over a 22-year period. The startling results showed that men with fasting glucose over 85 (mg/dL) had a 40% increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease. The researchers who conducted this study stated "fasting blood glucose values in the upper normal range appears to be an important independent predictor of cardiovascular death in nondiabetic apparently healthy middle-aged men."
So, is it your conclusion and belief that everyone should strive to have a fasting glucose level below 86 based on Bernstein's statement and one other journal article?
Also, I am not a big believer in using percentage increases as a measure of risk. Absolute numbers are much more meaningful. After all, in a large sample, if the number of people experiencing a certain adverse effect is relatively small, a 40% increase might still be relatively insignificant. It certainly does not mean someone has a 40% chance of having an adverse event.
Consider me a bit skeptical of Bernstein's conclusion.
We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm.
You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.
The opinions expressed in WebMD Communities are solely those of the User, who may or may not have medical or scientific training. These opinions do not represent the opinions of WebMD. Communities are not reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance, objectivity, or any other reason except for compliance with our Terms and Conditions. Some of these opinions may contain information about treatments or uses of drug products that have not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. WebMD does not endorse any specific product, service or treatment.
Do not consider Communities as medical advice. Never delay or disregard seeking professional medical advice from your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider because of something you have read on WebMD. You should always speak with your doctor before you start, stop, or change any prescribed part of your care plan or treatment. WebMD understands that reading individual, real-life experiences can be a helpful resource, but it is never a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment from a qualified health care provider. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or dial 911 immediately.