I am 8 weeks pregnant. Last week, I had my first ultrasound at exactly 7 weeks. They stated that it looks like I had a blighted ovum. They saw one empty yolk sac. We decided to wait one more week and do another ultrasound before having a D&C.
Yesterday we had quite a shock. There were now 2 yolk sacs in the same gestational sac, one of which was bigger than the other. We still did not see the embryos. The radiologist said it was very rare to see this and was inconclusive as to the viability of the pregnancy. As such, we decided to wait and look again in one more week.
Why is one yolk sac so much smaller than the other and is there still hope that it (or even the larger yolk sac) may have a developing baby?
Dear KMS: Alas, I am not a perinatologist so this will be a more general answer. As you likely know the gestational sac appears at about 4-5 weeks followed by the appearance of the yolk sac. That you have still not seen an embryo or cardiac motion does suggest a blighted ovum. For a good overview on the ultrasound assessment of pregnancy check this link:
After reviewing MULTIPLE studies at the National Library of Medicine site, this seemed to best address discordant yolk sac size:
Radiology. 1992 Apr;183(1):115-8. Yolk sac diameter and shape at endovaginal US: predictors of pregnancy outcome in the first trimester.
Lindsay DJ, Lovett IS, Lyons EA, Levi CS, Zheng XH, Holt SC, Dashefsky SM.
Department of Radiology, Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Man, Canada.
Four hundred eighty-six consecutive women who underwent endovaginal sonography when their fetuses were less than 10 weeks menstrual age (MA) were evaluated to establish the normal size and shape of the secondary yolk sac (YS) and to assess the value of YS measurement in predicting pregnancy outcome in the first trimester. A YS diameter more than two standard deviations (SDs) above the mean when compared with the mean gestational sac diameter allowed prediction of an abnormal pregnancy outcome with a sensitivity of 15.6%, a specificity of 97.4%, and a positive predictive value of 60.0%. A YS diameter more than two SDs below the mean allowed prediction of an abnormal outcome with a sensitivity of 15.6%, a specificity of 95.3%, and a positive predictive value of 44.4%. No pregnancy with a normal outcome had a YS diameter of greater than 5.6 mm at less than 10 weeks MA. In six patients, the YS diameter was greater than 5.6 mm. All six had an abnormal outcome. Of seven patients with abnormal YS shape at initial sonography, three had abnormal YS shape at follow-up examinations. All three had an abnormal outcome.
It sounds like your OB is being very thorough. I hope the next ultrasound will help to clarify your situation.
hi km i hope ur well, this post is so old lol. id like to know what your outcome was for the pregnancy u speak of as im in exactly the same sitiuation. id been scanned from 6.5 weeks and had to go back a week later as there was no fetal pole, the yolksac was large, went back the next week, still no fetal pole and yolk sac measured 9 mm. booked a dnc for the following week. they scanned me before the dnc and discovered the original yolksac had shrunk and looked normal and there was another one a bit smaller on the other side of the sack???. needless to say everyone was baffled so the dnc was cancelled and im to wait another week to see if theres any change, iv been told not to get my hopes up. i should be 8 weeks now, i know there should be evidence of fetal activity now its just very strange i hope u can help enlighten me with good or bad news of ur outcome . many thanks x
You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.
The opinions expressed in WebMD Communities are solely those of the User, who may or may not have medical or scientific training. These opinions do not represent the opinions of WebMD. Communities are not reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance, objectivity, or any other reason except for compliance with our Terms and Conditions. Some of these opinions may contain information about treatments or uses of drug products that have not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. WebMD does not endorse any specific product, service or treatment.
Do not consider Communities as medical advice. Never delay or disregard seeking professional medical advice from your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider because of something you have read on WebMD. You should always speak with your doctor before you start, stop, or change any prescribed part of your care plan or treatment. WebMD understands that reading individual, real-life experiences can be a helpful resource, but it is never a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment from a qualified health care provider. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or dial 911 immediately.