Skip to content

    Announcements

    Exciting News for WebMD Members!

    We've been busy behind the scenes building new message boards for you. You'll have new and easier ways to find messages, connect with others, and share your stories.

    And, this will all be available on your smartphone or other mobile device!

    What Do You Need to Do?

    The message board you're used to will be closing in the coming weeks. While many of your boards will be making the move to our new home, your posts will not. Want to keep a discussion going? Save posts you want to continue (this includes your member profile story), so that you can re-post them in the new message boards.

    Keep an eye here and on your email inbox, we'll be back in touch soon to give you all the information you need!


    Yours in health,
    WebMD Message Boards Management

    Includes Expert Content
    Not sure what is going on
    avatar
    Mel2day posted:
    I went to the dr's on Tuesday to have an ultrasound because of the abnormal bleeding I have been having off and on for the last three months and am confused by what occurred that day. First off, it only took 15 mins for her to do both a pelvic and a transvaginal ultrasound. I have had these in the past and they have taken at least 30-40 mins. Then as I was leaving I saw an image up on the ultrasound machine that almost looked like the profile of a baby...maybe I am imagining things I don't know...but of course now it has been three days and I still do not know the results. I am concerned that what I saw was not a "baby" but just some sort of growth. By the way I have taken several pregnancy tests over the last several weeks and all are negative. I was thinking though that the tech must have found what was causing the problem right away otherwise I think it may have taken longer to find it. What is someone's input on this, I am curious if anyone else has had this happen to them.
    Reply
     
    avatar
    Jane Harrison Hohner, RN, RNP responded:
    Dear Mel2day: The time it takes to do ultrasound does not always indicate the quality of the scan, nor does a shorter ultrasound mean that they found something then stopped. A pelvic ultrasound done by a radiologist can include a scan of the kidneys, whilst a scan in a GYN's office may not. At one point there was a debate between the official organization of OB/GYN MDs and that of Radiologists as to whether GYNs were doing what the radiologists feel is a complete OB or GYN ultrasound.

    I can understand your concern about not getting results after 72 hours. Hopefully they either scheduled you for a follow up visit, or planned to have your GYN call you with the results. In my clinical experience, if there is a "bad" result, the woman will be notified immediately because of the medical-legal implications of a "delay to diagnosis." She would then be scheduled for more testing or biopsy/surgery. If you do not hear back, call the office and request a copy of your resutls.

    Hope your results are within normal limits and/or easily treated to get rid of the bleeding. Feel free to write back with your results, or if you have questions.

    In Support,
    Jane


    Helpful Tips

    Be the first to post a Tip!

    Expert Blog

    Below the Belt: Women's Health - Jane Harrison-Hohner, RN, RNP

    From HPV to irregular periods to PMS to fibroids, Jane Harrison-Hohner, RN, is here to share her knowledge and insight...Read More

    Report Problems With Your Medications to the FDA

    FDAYou are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.