Skip to content
Oral Fluids vs Blood test
hondoguyo94 posted:
After my brief vaginal unprotected exposure, I've tested 3 times, using oraquick, at 9 weeks, at 11 weeks, and at 12 weeks, all negative. My biggest fear that bothers the living hell out of me is that one day when I try to go to the military or get health insurance . I'll get terrible news about HIV showing up in my blood
georgiagail responded:
Any test done at least 12 weeks after a potential exposure is considered to be both definitive and conclusive in terms of ones status.

In other words, your testing has shown you are HIV negative.

If you are worried that the oraquick testing will not show HIV in blood because it takes samples from the oral cavity (and not blood) don't be. In an HIV positive individual the virus would be found in these mucousal cells.

Once again, if you remain unconvinced of the accuracy of these type of tests and the idea that you may be HIV positive is making your life a "living hell" then go get a blood test to confirm your negative status.

hondoguyo94 replied to georgiagail's response:
So my question is, can I rely on this test and should I worry about hiv showing up in the future from this exposure. On a blood test
georgiagail replied to hondoguyo94's response:
Yes, you can rely on the accuracy of this test. You are HIV negative. HIV won't pop up down the road from this exposure.


Helpful Tips

Help asap
My daughter disclosed to me that she was exposed to HIV. She denies that he has been tested for HIV. He also is not high risk. She told me ... More
Was this Helpful?
0 of 0 found this helpful

Related Drug Reviews

  • Drug Name User Reviews

Report Problems With Your Medications to the FDA

FDAYou are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.