Skip to content


    Exciting News for WebMD Members!

    We've been busy behind the scenes building new message boards for you. You'll have new and easier ways to find messages, connect with others, and share your stories.

    And, this will all be available on your smartphone or other mobile device!

    What Do You Need to Do?

    The message board you're used to will be closing in the coming weeks. While many of your boards will be making the move to our new home, your posts will not. Want to keep a discussion going? Save posts you want to continue (this includes your member profile story), so that you can re-post them in the new message boards.

    Keep an eye here and on your email inbox, we'll be back in touch soon to give you all the information you need!

    Yours in health,
    WebMD Message Boards Management

    Question about testing accuracy and my situation
    cpd123 posted:

    I had sex in which I was the recipient of anal sex. I also had oral. Oral was protected until the last minute, then he finished giving me oral. The anal was protected at first, but I am not sure if it was the whole time.

    I went and was tested at 2 weeks post exposure.It was a rapid test and was negative. I was tested again at 4 wks (26 days) post exposure with an Antibody (3rd gen) and an RNA. Both were negative.

    I am still very concerned about this. Should I feel somewhat comfortable or reliable with those results and the tests? I am going to get tested again at 5 and/ or 6 weeks. Would those be ones that I should feel good and reliable with?

    I realize 3 months would be ideal, but I cannot wait that long. I have read that antibdy tests at 28 days are fairly reliable and that the RNA test at about 2-3 weeks is also. Any advice or info would be greatly appreciated.
    georgiagail responded:
    Oral sex carries an extremely low risk of HIV transmission. Think along the lines of .5 to 1 per 10,000 exposures with a source known to carry the virus.

    Protected anal intercourse is, indeed protected assuming a condom was used and used accurately. The virus cannot cross an intact latex condom.

    If you remain concerned the recommended time for testing continues to be 3 months.

    cpd123 replied to georgiagail's response:
    I do still feel concerned.

    I am going to test at 3 months, but with the ones I have taken being negative and their windows, should I be very worried?

    I cannot say for sure the condom was used the whole time...
    georgiagail replied to cpd123's response:
    A test done at 4 weeks after a potential exposure is considered to be 95 percent accurate.

    By 3 months this has increased to 99.99 percent.

    The odds remain very much in your favor toward a negative status.


    Helpful Tips

    What steps to take if you test positive?Expert
    Hello community, Dan, Gail and myself often answer questions around the potential risk of different exposures for those of you who are ... More
    Was this Helpful?
    27 of 40 found this helpful

    Related Drug Reviews

    • Drug Name User Reviews

    Report Problems With Your Medications to the FDA

    FDAYou are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.