See All
Preferences
My Communities
My Discussions
My Email Digests
In my mind i believe i have hiv, i am just scared that its in my system n taking advantage n weaking my immune system more than i belive it was be4 infection, hence the white tounge and oral abcesses.
my question is if i was actually exp ARS symptoms since 11/27 n now 8 1/2wks after my body would have created at least a few anti-bodies to be detected on test.
Also since the RNA test actually looks for the virus its self not the antibodies and i have been exp ARS symptoms and also during recent infection is when people Viral load is at its highest, would the RNA test been able to detect it? i am very confused and tired of all this, i just want to feel normal again. Any info would be helpful. thanx!
First, your symptoms have nothing to do with HIV. The only symptoms that anyone may experience after infection is a short illness that looks and feels exactly like the flu. Your symptoms do not match and they have gone on much too long to have any connection with HIV.
Second, you have had several RNA PCR tests. While these tests are not recommended for HIV diagnosis, that is due to their tendency for false positives.
If you had been infected, your blood would have been swimming with HIV by 18 days and by 5 1/2 weeks. The antibody tests have such a long window period because of the variable of individual's immune responses. However, the RNA PCR test depends on HIV's replication. Once it enters the blood stream and infects a CD4 cell, it begins making copies rapidly and the viral load increases exponentially.That no HIV was found indicates to be that there was no HIV to be found in the first place.
Your last antibody test at 9 1/2 weeks, while not 100% conclusive, is so very close to conclusive that combined with the PCR results I don't see any reason to doubt it. 95% of people who get infected will test positive by 30 days.
And, at the very root of the matter, your risk was not terribly great. We're talking about a few brief moments of unprotected exposure to vaginal fluids. The average estimated risk of infection for a man having unprotected vaginal intercourse with a woman known to have HIV is 1 in 2000. The odds are much better for you because of the short duration and the fact that you don't know that the woman is infected at all. She may be "promiscuous," but that doesn't mean anything if she play safe.
I would recommend you get a final antibody test on February 18 just for the peace of mind, but I really don't think you have HIV and I don't think you have any reason to worry. If it weren't for your state of mind, I would even go so far as to say that you don't need any further testing.
Dan
Please keep in mind (as Dan wrote) that none of your symptoms have anything to do with HIV.
How do we know this?
Because it takes...literally....years for the virus to damage your immune system to the point where one might begin to develop oral thrush, severe weight loss, GI issues w/malnutrition, specific types of pneumonia, skin lesions, etc.. On the average a decade in an untreated individual. Such damage does not occur weeks, months or even a few years after transmission.
What one does see in early onset HIV is a 2 week period of flu like symptoms that occur two to six weeks after the initial tranmission. That's it. Once that two week period is over, there ARE no symptoms for many years (one reason quite a few people ARE walking around with HIV and unless they are tested, are totally unaware of this).
Thus, when someone reports symptoms that we only see in end stage HIV weeks or a few months after a possible exposure we realize that it's quite likely they're suffering more from "internetitis", having cruised the web looking for symptoms and ending up seeing every symptom in themselves.
In other words, as you said "in my mind I believe I have HIV". Of course you do. And thus every "symptom" you've noticed simply confirms this.
Quite frankly, there is no reason that a 12 week screening test (which is the recommended time period to wait for testing) will show absolutely no different results than all the previous (and pretty darn expensive!) testing you've already undergone.
Gail
Anyhow: 2 condom breakages in one night is highly unusual. Condoms generally have a failure rate of 2% but I've used them well over 100 times and I've never experienced a break.
You should in future make sure to use ordinary latex condoms, not sheepskin or ultra-thin or some kind of novelty type. You should also make sure to use plenty of water- or silicone-based lubricant. Never use an oil-based lubricant: that can weaken the latex and make breakages easier.
Dan
Gail
HIV does not "hide," not in the lymph nodes nor anywhere else.
A virus is an errant strand of DNA that cannot make copies of itself by itself but instead has to get inside another cell and use the reproductive faculty of the cell to replicate itself. Different viruses will be able to penetrate some cells but not others; HIV's chemical structure allows it to enter the CD4 white blood cells, whose main job is to destroy infections.
These "T-cells" are present in the blood, created by your bone marrow. They have nothing to do with the lymph nodes. The lymph nodes are filters that remove infections from the blood.
When HIV first enters the body, there many only be a few copies. If they find their way into a CD4 cell, they begin to replicate until they fill us the cell and the cell bursts, releasing thousands of HIV copies into the blood to infect other cells. There is no "hiding" involved, because if HIV cannot find a cell to infect it will die.
Dan
Shortly after HIV enters the body, it starts making copies of itself and the amount of HIV in the blood skyrockets very quickly.
The lymph nodes filter the blood from infections. As HIV multiplies, they go into action. As they do their job, they swell. That's what swollen lymph nodes are: a sign that they are filtering the blood from infection.
Stomach issues as a kid would not affect the rate at which your body produces antibodies. But anyway: the PCR test could not find any HIV in your blood at 18 days or at 5 1/2 weeks. If you had been infected your blood would be swimming with HIV. That, to me, proves you are negative.
thanks for the reply and ur honest answer. I just dont like to kid myself. what else can make ur lymph nodes swell all over the body after a recent hiv risk expousure. I checked the list of illnesses n the rest wouldnt make sense. I believe HIV is the main cause of my issue, I know that after all the testing and all the negatives everything shub be good inside me, but its not. i mean the only ARS symptoms that i havent gotten during the 2 1/2 period has been fever and sword throat, but just yesterday i had issues with the swollen lymph nodes all day and again they were all over the body and this happens often. Its scary to feel a lymph node swell n to tell urself that must be my lymph nodes attempting to filter out HIV. Thats the reality of it at this point. I will go and get tested again at the 12wk mark. At this point i guess i am more hoping that i would just be infected with HIV and not with HPV too, that would just suck. By the way whats the difference testing wise between a NAAT and a PCR RNA? Dont both of them look for the virus itself. I know that NAAT is a test being offered as a comb when taking a rapid hiv test here in chicago.
More from WebMD related to this Discussion
Women's Health Newsletter
Find out what women really need.
Helpful Tips
- Coping With Anxiety & HIV Worry
- A few words of advice that you can choose to take to heart
- Nutrition and HIV/AIDS
Helpful Resources
Related News
Related Drug Reviews
- Drug Name User Reviews
Report Problems to the
Food and Drug Administration
You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.
Other HIV/AIDS Information
More Related Communities
The opinions expressed in WebMD User-generated content areas like communities, reviews, ratings, or blogs are solely those of the User, who may or may not have medical or scientific training. These opinions do not represent the opinions of WebMD. User-generated content areas are not reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance, objectivity, or any other reason except for compliance with our Terms and Conditions. Some of these opinions may contain information about treatments or uses of drug products that have not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. WebMD does not endorse any specific product, service, or treatment.
Do not consider WebMD User-generated content as medical advice. Never delay or disregard seeking professional medical advice from your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider because of something you have read on WebMD. You should always speak with your doctor before you start, stop, or change any prescribed part of your care plan or treatment. WebMD understands that reading individual, real-life experiences can be a helpful resource, but it is never a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment from a qualified health care provider. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or dial 911 immediately.
Health Solutions From Our Sponsors
©2005-2013 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved.
WebMD does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See additional information.


