Skip to content

    Announcements

    Exciting News for WebMD Members!

    We've been busy behind the scenes building new message boards for you. You'll have new and easier ways to find messages, connect with others, and share your stories.

    And, this will all be available on your smartphone or other mobile device!

    What Do You Need to Do?

    The message board you're used to will be closing in the coming weeks. While many of your boards will be making the move to our new home, your posts will not. Want to keep a discussion going? Save posts you want to continue (this includes your member profile story), so that you can re-post them in the new message boards.

    Keep an eye here and on your email inbox, we'll be back in touch soon to give you all the information you need!


    Yours in health,
    WebMD Message Boards Management

    Have you had a kidney transplant or are waiting for one? Then visit the Organ Transplant Community and the Diabetes and Kidney Community to share your experiences with other community members!

    Are you newly diagnosed? Use the WebMD search engine to read articles like Understanding Kidney Disease.
    nanny lou
    avatar
    An_250616 posted:
    hello i am 59 13 years ago i was told i had two cysts on my right kidney. they were the type that would never do anything. after finding out a family member has cancer of kidney i went back and pulled my records from another state. in reading to take the cysts size and answer to my currant Dr., i found another paper that bothered me. it stated my cysts were not cysts but two masses in the right kidney. i was angry and this week will have a ultrasound. how could this happen and what am i looking at? i have some pain on my right side. the letter also stated i should have had a MRI> how was this missed why was i not informed they were masses and not cysts (the words not cysts were underlined) after 13 years i am worried. any thoughts? suggestions?
    Reply
     
    avatar
    john-skpt responded:
    It might be due to the difference in the technology from a while back and today; imaging techniques are constantly getting better and better over time, so maybe the newer ultrasound showed more definite results that the older one did.

    Probably the only way to be sure is to follow up with a different method like CT or MRI (as was recommended previously).

    There are a number of different types of renal masses that are non-malignant. So it might also be that there are small vascular or fatty lesions on the kidney that are not cysts but also are not cancerous. You have to follow up with your local doc and probably get some additional testing done to know once and for all.


    Spotlight: Member Stories

    I am 43 years old, have 2 beautiful children, 4 resuced kitties, and just remarried to a wonderful man. I have been very sick and unable to work since...More

    Helpful Tips

    QUESTION
    MY DAUGHTER WAS JUST DIAGONSED WITH KINDEY FAILURE LAST YEAR SHE IS ALMOST 5 YEARS OLD AND I WAS WONDERING SHE HAS A BACTERIAL INFECTION IS ... More
    Was this Helpful?
    1 of 2 found this helpful

    Report Problems With Your Medications to the FDA

    FDAYou are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.