Skip to content
My WebMD Sign In, Sign Up
Attack The Implant Lawsuit Maze Before You Go Under The Knife
avatar
falascoj posted:
Regulations For Everything Except : "I've Fallen & Can't Get Up "

In a world that regulates toxic waste disposal ,fuel emissions, food additives , communications signals and hundreds of other areas touching our daily lives , we don't regulate the quality of the medical devices we place in our bodies . Yes -- it's true , "I've Fallen & Can't Get Up " could very well apply to the fact that the entire medical implant community has no compelling reason to check or inspect the various bone screws and associated , hip ,knee ,elbow, shoulder ,or spinal devices that are placed inside thousands of patients yearly. It's hard to believe that the only FDA guidance on implant quality control comes under the guise of 510 (K) processes which only mandates device manufacturers adhere to "best practices". It's no wonder that there is a lengthy list of implant recalls and multiple lawsuits clogging our courts today.

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ListofRecalls/default.htm

We the people simply don't realize that when we go in for an implant procedure the devices being used have a high risk of never been inspected for flaws, material strength or overall compliance to design specifications. We see the results of our misguided assumptions daily as the recalls and lawsuits pile up. The device & implant companies' solution is shockingly arrogant. They set up massive funds in advance to settle expected lawsuit settlements that range from $200,000 -$500,000 and employ larger legal teams then quality control specialists. We see story after story in newspapers, on TV and the internet covering the pain and suffering caused by implant malfunctions. Yet with all these exposures we fail to grasp that the crux of the issue is demanding the parts going into our bodies undergo the same quality control we expect in every other device that touches are daily lives.

Is There A Better Way?

Yes technology exists that is far superior and quantitative to what medical device manufacturers are using today- if anything to insure the parts that they are placing into the community are within tolerance to design specifications. If manufacturers are doing anything about quality control they are relaying on technology from 1906 optical comparators, slightly more modern coordinate measuring machines or microscopes to inspect thousands of parts. All these methods are very suspect in terms of actually providing modern quality metrics. Through the utilization of various types of robotic automated inspection technology the medical manufacturing industries could measure and ensure part tolerances to a very high degree. These 3-D approaches would be a winning play for all concerned. Manufacturers could pay out the money now earmarked for lawsuits to their shareholders and the public would be insured that the implant parts going into their bodies were within the design tolerances they were specified at. We all win under this scenario and pave the way for cost reductions to the concept of Affordable Care going forward.

Take the Poll

What what you pay to make sure the implants used in your procedure were not defective ?
  • $300.00
  • $500.00
  • $1,000.00
  • Don't Care If Defective Parts Used : I'll Just File A Lawsuit
vote
View Poll Results
Reply


Helpful Tips

duct leakage test
This could be everybody's great solution for carrying ladders inside house and risking own life from falling, ... More
Was this Helpful?
1 of 1 found this helpful

Related News

There was an error with this newsfeed

Related Drug Reviews

  • Drug Name User Reviews

Report Problems With Your Medications to the FDA

FDAYou are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.

For more information, visit the Duke Health Joint Replacement Center