Skip to content


    Exciting News for WebMD Members!

    We've been busy behind the scenes building new message boards for you. You'll have new and easier ways to find messages, connect with others, and share your stories.

    And, this will all be available on your smartphone or other mobile device!

    What Do You Need to Do?

    The message board you're used to will be closing in the coming weeks. While many of your boards will be making the move to our new home, your posts will not. Want to keep a discussion going? Save posts you want to continue (this includes your member profile story), so that you can re-post them in the new message boards.

    Keep an eye here and on your email inbox, we'll be back in touch soon to give you all the information you need!

    Yours in health,
    WebMD Message Boards Management

    What a Great Experience this group has become. The kinship in Brotherhood. There is such a diverse range of topics. This is the place we can be as open as we want to be... Everyone is welcome to join, but it is not a place to Cruise. It's for sharing sexual questions and comments among men.
    My Foreskin: Worth > $313
    gymrat44 posted:
    A recent article out in a medical journal this week advocating circumcision said that on the average a circumcised male saves the health care expenditure $313 for expenses he on the average would have incurred had he been circumcised.

    Much of the data for this report was gathered from sources outside the United States and may or may not be applicable to this country. And working with averages can always be difficult. But I do know that I am in my 60s and having had my foreskin with me all this time has yet to cost me anything. But if for some reason I had to pay the powers that be $313 in order to keep it and there was no way around that, I would gladly shell that amount out to keep that part of original factory equipment.

    My foreskin is worth more than $313. And I have trouble going along with this study's conclusions.
    manhood should be enjoyed, not proven -- gymrat44
    An_247002 responded:
    I think you meant to say "...$313 for expenses he on the average would have incurred had he been UNcircumcised."

    I agree with you. I'm also uncut and never have any medical issue that would cost me even dime.

    Majority of men from other parts of the world are also uncut. I don't think it would cost them $313.
    gymrat44 replied to An_247002's response:
    Hey, thanks An_247002, you're right. I was tired when I made that entry and upon re-reading it I realized that it would take some work on the reader's part to figure out what I had meant -- not the way I like to do things. I appreciate your having made the story clearer.

    Apparently there are some STDs and HIV which have a higher incidence among the uncircumcised according to the study and that's where the $313 per capita comes from. But I think that you and many of the other guys will agree that there are ways to prevent STDs and HIV without lopping off a body part without the owner's permission!
    manhood should be enjoyed, not proven -- gymrat44

    Spotlight: Member Stories I enjoy reading posts and learning things from this webmd community. It's been fun to be able to openly share and ask things I w...More

    Helpful Tips

    Anal issue
    I've had this pain on the outer region of my anal, it have tried to ignore it but the pain has been persistent. I recently researched what ... More
    Was this Helpful?
    0 of 0 found this helpful

    Report Problems With Your Medications to the FDA

    FDAYou are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit the FDA MedWatch website or call 1-800-FDA-1088.